formation-docs/analysis/principle-maps/ica-cooperative-identity-alignment.md

ICA Cooperative Identity Alignment

Source summary

The ICA Statement is a compact organizational constitution for cooperative governance. It is especially useful because it combines democratic control, economic participation, autonomy, education, solidarity, and concern for community in a single governance identity.


Sourcing and language status


Alignment table

1. Dignity is inherent and unconditional
Alignment
implicit-alignment
Confidence
low
Source provisions
equality, equity, solidarity
Notes
Dignity is implied through values rather than named.
2. Essential needs should not be held hostage to avoidable scarcity
Alignment
implicit-alignment
Confidence
low
Source provisions
cooperative definition
Notes
The aim is mutual needs satisfaction, though not framed as a broad social right.
3. AI must augment agency, not replace democratic accountability
Alignment
implicit-alignment
Confidence
low
Source provisions
democratic member control
Notes
No AI language, but the governance principle is strongly relevant.
4. Power must remain accountable, legible, and reversible
Alignment
explicit-alignment
Confidence
medium
Source provisions
democratic member control, autonomy and independence
Notes
Strong overlap at organizational scale.
5. Critical systems require public-interest governance
Alignment
explicit-alignment
Confidence
medium
Source provisions
democratic enterprise definition, concern for community
Notes
Strong evidence for alternative governance models beyond shareholder primacy.
6. The gains from automation should strengthen society, not destabilize it
Alignment
implicit-alignment
Confidence
medium
Source provisions
member economic participation
Notes
Productive gains are meant to circulate through members and community.
7. Freedom requires both liberty and material stability
Alignment
implicit-alignment
Confidence
low
Source provisions
meeting common economic, social and cultural needs
Notes
Material stability is built into the cooperative purpose.
8. No class of people should become structurally excluded
Alignment
explicit-alignment
Confidence
medium
Source provisions
voluntary and open membership
Notes
Strong inclusion principle.
9. Institutions should be designed for competence and trust, not theater
Alignment
explicit-alignment
Confidence
medium
Source provisions
education, training and information
Notes
Real participation requires institutional capability and member education.
10. The future should be built in the open
Alignment
explicit-alignment
Confidence
medium
Source provisions
democratic member control, openness
Notes
Strong overlap at the organizational level.
11. Civilization depends on a functioning biosphere
Alignment
absent
Confidence
high
Source provisions
none in retained summary
Notes
Community concern is present, but ecology is not explicit here.
12. The present generation holds obligations to the future
Alignment
implicit-alignment
Confidence
low
Source provisions
concern for community
Notes
Future orientation is indirect.
13. Pluralism and self-determination are strengths, not obstacles
Alignment
explicit-alignment
Confidence
medium
Source provisions
autonomy and independence; open membership
Notes
Strong overlap.
14. Truth and evidence must be protected as public goods
Alignment
implicit-alignment
Confidence
low
Source provisions
education, training and information; honesty and openness
Notes
Some overlap, but not a full epistemic principle.
15. The circle of moral consideration must remain open
Alignment
absent
Confidence
high
Source provisions
none
Notes
No comparable principle.
16. Justice mediates between competing claims
Alignment
explicit-alignment
Confidence
medium
Source provisions
equality, equity, solidarity
Notes
Justice logic is embedded strongly in the values set.
17. Collective power must be exercised within principled constraints
Alignment
explicit-alignment
Confidence
high
Source provisions
democratic control, autonomy, community concern
Notes
Strong overlap.

Distinctive commitments and gaps

Distinctive contribution

  • democratic economic governance as identity
  • community concern without surrendering member control

Main absences

  • ecology as a first-order principle
  • rights language
  • AI
  • future-generations specificity

Open question

  • Should Civic Blueprint draw more explicitly from cooperative identity language when describing public-interest governance alternatives under Principle 5?